Contract Testing

Contract Testing Google Pub/Sub: Using AsyncAPI specs as Executable Contracts

Demonstration, Feature Spotlight, Updates / By / , , ,

Shift-Left the identification of integration issues in applications built with Event Driven Architecture (EDA) by leveraging AsyncAPI specs as Executable Contracts Introduction The surge in popularity of microservices has revolutionized the way we think about software architecture. However, as systems grow and inter-service communication increases, the risk of integration issues can also rise. One such […]

Contract Testing Google Pub/Sub: Using AsyncAPI specs as Executable Contracts Read More »

Introduction to Contract Driven Development with Specmatic

Feature Spotlight, Updates / By / , , , , , ,

Transcript Hi, welcome to this demo of contract-driven development where I’m going to use Specmatic, an open-source tool to turn your API specification into executable contracts. We have an app which sends a request to a BFF, a backend for frontend, which in turn sends a request to a domain service. Notice you could have

Introduction to Contract Driven Development with Specmatic Read More »

JDBC stubbing with Redis and Specmatic contract testing.

Break the Chains of Database Dependencies: Leveraging Specmatic for JDBC Stubbing

Demonstration, Feature Spotlight, Updates / By / , , ,

With Specmatic JDBC stub, you can easily test APIs without the need for a complex database setup. By switching out the real database with a Specmatic JDBC stub, we can set expectations for the stub to respond to specific queries. These expectations can be recorded based on actual interactions. Once the expectations are set, we no longer need the database for our tests!

Break the Chains of Database Dependencies: Leveraging Specmatic for JDBC Stubbing Read More »

Comparison of Specmatic and Spring Cloud Contract.

Comparison: Specmatic vs Spring Cloud Contract

Comparisons, Updates / By / , , , , , , , ,

With Spring Cloud Contract we can start by authoring the API contract in one of the supported DSLs, based on which the provider / producer is verified and in the process stubs are generated for consumers. This makes it possible to leverage it as both a “consumer driven” or “provider driven” contract testing tool. There are also some interesting points about how we share contracts and stubs (through artifact managers, source control, etc.) with Spring Cloud Contract. Let us look at the detailed comparison between Specmatic and Spring Cloud Contract. Please do leave a comment if there are other areas of comparison on which you would like to see additional details.

Comparison: Specmatic vs Spring Cloud Contract Read More »

Specmatic vs Wiremock comparison

Comparison: Specmatic vs WireMock

Comparisons, Updates / By / , , , , ,

API mocking is only effective if the mocks are truly representative of the provider / services they are emulating. Deviations between mocks and providers can lead to integration issues much later in the development cycle. In order to avoid such issues it is important to keep in mind that selecting an API mocking tool is not an isolated decision. It has to be in line with your overall microservices development, testing and deployment goals.

Comparison: Specmatic vs WireMock Read More »

Specmatic vs Pact & Pactflow comparison

Comparison: Specmatic vs Pact.io and Pactflow.io

Comparisons, Updates / By / , , , , , , , , , , ,

Specmatic and Contract Driven Development differ significantly from Pact. We built Specmatic out of our own necessity where Pact did not fit the bill for us. We have tried to cover as many areas of comparison as possible, however we would love to hear if you have any other criteria on which you would like to see additional details.

Comparison: Specmatic vs Pact.io and Pactflow.io Read More »

We're hiring!
We're hiring!